But i still need to reformulate and format them
Like its like a un open source type thing, but defining morals as
Not god given rules, but collection of best tools we have
Like you dont get to claim your a good person bc you have a good hammer
Like you can just kill everyone opposing you, but there are probably some ppl angry at you for that
So the tool is quite expensive to use
Like i put the un rules in there, bc they are all
Well, cant argue with that stuff
But instead of trying to help everyone, my stuff is more focused towards progress
Bc yes everyone helps, but it may be that some ppl are probably more effective at that
Like there was a word for like
Just let the smart ppl rule, but we dont actually want that, bc
If you got a leaking pipe, and you got a choice between a really smart person and a experienced plumber, you probably dont want the smart person
Like there is a layer of competence hierarchys in there, also like balancing the differences between females and males etc
So i am trying to disproportionately favor those ppl, like a company would, *
Like you get it
Like the biggest criticism i hear is, those ppl playing Gouverment but actually not doing much
And on the other side
Those ppl doing too much and trying to play Gouverment and rule ppl
So like, lets do something in between, and see where i get with that
Like the power is not with me, the blockchain directly relays back to the ppl themselves
I do like setup of the machine, but like open source, ppl maintain themselves and all the power and responsibilitie is with them too
So i am avoiding the responsibility and weight of that structure
Like ruling is a fing pain in the butt
With the poliglyth chain ppl can organize their own stuff
And payment for stuff is built into it by design, ppl can do their own fronteds however they like and choose their own rates, but base functionality of distributing value is built into it
Like its Client, server, but with blockchain
Like less humanistic, more engineering, fitting into the new data paradigm
I also extended globalism, to interplanetaryanism
First, bc globalisms diapi is too heavy already
And second, bc why not
At some point we will need it, and its a cool gimmick, good vibe, automatically sets a targeting goal of where we are actually going
Like the iftp ppl were there before me, they should be allowed to give it a better name
But conceptually, it shouldnt matter which planet your on
Also it will confuse the hell out of future historians :p
Like i think thats funny
Like why these ppl using interplanetary value systems before they were interplanetary, lol
Like i am aiming acidentaly high again ^~^
But like its certainly a vibe
Like i am setting up a pun for after space colonization
Leave a Reply