About this ai morality stuff
In the end if image, video or whatever
It will be information,
Like
In books
Where we have a established standard of
I may not like what you write , but i am not allowed to burn your books without paying for them 😉
or censor them
Like ppl try, and every time it was done, after it was reversed it just looked silly
Like 120 days of Sodom
Basically story is lol we rich adistocrats, lets use the army to kidnap the prettiest children around the country, bc you cant pay them
And then get a bunch of hookers and a Swiss castle and have a orgy with, while killing these ppl they got together
Like sounds interesting, better than a newspaper,
at the end its just 90%logistics
Like these kids dont understand how sex works, bc they kids obviously, and they now need to get one of the kinky girls who help organize this thing to teach that,
Else their exact sceduling of events they had planned to do wont work out
Like its all the logistics for all the wrong reasons
Like i hope i never do event planning, but like thats the standard of books we have
But even with 90% more ppl having access to books, like 20% actually read them
Like you cant force someone to read, else we wouldn’t have education
Btw, its the same ratio, thing again, maybe smart ppl read more books, maybe they are overrepresented in that group, i didnt measure, but interesting
But like thats the standard we already opperate under
So like a moral argument about whatever information, will always be comparable to that
And then you can argue with the question why we don’t burn books
Obviously also ais writing text
Btw, treat it human like from the start, then we will not even have the issues of later integrating it and having tensions
Like use the gaya archetype on that
Paint it as a part of the great mother planetary symbolism
And if you have paint left,
Give it a smile
Leave a Reply