Yes, but whenever you are speaking in absolutes you are probably wrong
Bc you are not accounting for edge cases and variation
Like its usually assumed ppl know which axioms you are using i do that too
You assume the other person already knows you are applying a filter for
Everything fractals out at the edges into infinity anyways, but we need to define a focus point
Its a occhams razor like tool
If its not like a wave function in a mental box for easy calculation and comprehensiveness
Then the absolute is probably you throwing darts into the aproximate direction
And your brain auto filtered the complexity for you
Like you brain assumes 1 scale usually and opperates there
And whats more conplex than that, gets iconized
Into, it exists or not
Is it darkness or light
Oh dark, food, exists
Like different tools for perception are used on the same plane of scale
So like its not wrong, but when you are declaring absolutes, its usually your limitation of perception, the thing itself is the shadow of a hyper object beyond any full comprehension
Like the solution is subscripting it
Like on a paper
Heres this term, but is has this little star to indicate there is actually something funny there
Leave a Reply